Circulating supply: 2 800 068 700 $
Max supply: 3 175 000 000 $
Cmc rank: 58
Volume 24h: 69 645 143 $
Percent change 1h: 0,2 %
Percent change 24h: 5,2 %
Percent Change 7d: 4,4 %
Circulating supply: 404 509 880 $
Max supply: 0 $
Cmc rank: 9
Volume 24h: 409 956 790 $
Percent change 1h: 0,79 %
Percent change 24h: -0,43 %
Percent Change 7d: 1,5 %
FTM vs SOL: historical overview
Solana and Fantom are both relatively new blockchain projects that have emerged in the last few years. Here is a brief historical overview of both:
- Solana was founded in 2017 by Anatoly Yakovenko, a former Qualcomm engineer.
- The Solana blockchain went live in March 2020, after raising $25 million in an initial coin offering (ICO) in 2019.
- Solana has gained popularity due to its high speed and low transaction costs, which it achieves through its unique consensus mechanism called Proof of History.
- Solana has seen significant growth in 2021, with its native token SOL rising from around $1 in January to over $250 in November.
- During its trading history, Solana has experienced more than 12 outages, with 5 happening in 2022 and a significant outage called the Mainnet Beta Outage, which occurred on February 25 of this year.
- Fantom was founded in 2018 by a team of developers led by Michael Kong.
- The Fantom blockchain launched its mainnet in December 2019, and has since been working on developing its ecosystem.
- Like Solana, Fantom is concerned with providing a scalable, fast blockchain network, and applies a consensus mechanism titled Lachesis to achieve this.
- In 2021, Fantom has also seen substantial growth, with its native token FTM rising from around $0.01 in January to over $3 in October.
- On Fantom, 2022 marked the introduction of several new dApps and projects like 1inch, Premia, and UniDex, which enable financiers to take charge of their funds independently.
Difference between Fantom and Solana
Here are some other differences between Fantom and Solana:
- Consensus mechanism: Solana uses a proof-of-history consensus mechanism, while Fantom uses a directed acyclic graph (DAG) consensus mechanism.
- Transaction fees: The transaction fees on Solana are generally lower than those on Fantom.
- Network speed: Solana claims to be capable of processing 65,000 transactions per second, while Fantom claims to be capable of processing up to 300,000 transactions per second.
- Staking: the minimum amount of FTM required for staking is much lower than that of Solana. Additionally, Fantom offers more flexible staking options, including the ability to delegate to a validator or stake in a liquidity pool. Solana, on the other hand, offers only validator staking, but SOL staking rewards are currently higher than Fantom's.
- Circulating supply: FTM's total supply amounts to 3175000000 tokens, with 2800068670 tokens currently in circulation. The remaining tokens are set to be released according to a schedule that extends until 2023. Meanwhile, Solana has a circulating supply of 404509879 SOL coins, but the maximum supply is not available.
- Ecosystem: Solana has a larger ecosystem of applications and developers, while Fantom is still growing its ecosystem.
- Partnerships: Solana has partnerships with several major players in the industry, including Serum, Chainlink, and USDC, while Fantom has partnerships with several DeFi projects and blockchain infrastructure providers.
FTM vs SOL Price Chart
Make your decision wisely and ensure maximum profitability before exchanging your FTM for SOL. To determine whether the trade is favorable, refer to our real-time price chart which includes FTM, SOL, and USD exchange rates. This data is crucial for investors to make an informed decision and develop an accurate prediction of the future price movements of both cryptocurrencies.
Fantom vs Solana: conclusion
Both Fantom and Solana are innovative and promising blockchain platforms that have gained popularity and recognition in the crypto world. While Fantom is known for its speedy and cheap transactions, Solana is famed for its high throughput and scalability. Both platforms offer staking and yield farming opportunities to investors, with Fantom's staking requiring a lower minimum amount of FTM compared to Solana's SOL. Ultimately, the choice between investing in Fantom or Solana will depend on an individual investor's objectives and risk tolerance, as well as their investigation of the current market conditions and price dynamics.