NEAR vs MATIC compare


About NEAR

  • Name: NEAR Protocol

  • Symbol: NEAR

  • Circulating supply: 941 671 520 $

  • Max supply: 0 $

  • Cmc rank: 39

  • Volume 24h: 53 994 596 $

  • Percent change 1h: -0,1 %

  • Percent change 24h: 2,5 %

  • Percent Change 7d: 4 %


  • Name: Polygon

  • Symbol: MATIC

  • Circulating supply: 9 319 469 100 $

  • Max supply: 10 000 000 000 $

  • Cmc rank: 12

  • Volume 24h: 284 390 920 $

  • Percent change 1h: 0,17 %

  • Percent change 24h: -0,094 %

  • Percent Change 7d: -3,1 %

So, you listen of both NEAR  vs MATIC  cryptocurrencies, but you're not secure which one is superiorly? Don't be concerned. This is one of the most joint questions in the life of cryptocurrencies, since both crypto are very analogous to each other. Consequently, in this guidance, we will lean over backwards to inform you what is alike and how the NEAR Protocol  cryptocurrency be different from Polygon  .

NEAR vs MATIC : which is superiorly?

Both schemes have own cryptocurrencies that are spent by their seed patron, private patron and general patron. Also, they are plainly traded by cryptocurrency exchanges and are used as a agent to trade value or for abstract investment. So, NEAR Protocol vs Polygon in time of token sense and exchangeability are pretty resemble considering that both their sense floats and sways according to market circs.

A quick stocktaking to a NEAR Protocol  vs Polygon  price chart

Both  NEAR Protocol vs Polygon suffer from the same fluctuations that all fundamental crypto markets do, it’s right that at the same times they can perform better than the antediluvian cryptos, but they still are knotty and behave as other major crypto commerce. So the  NEAR  vs MATIC feud cannot be derived just by observing at trading/price diagram.

NEAR vs MATIC  : conclusion

NEAR  and MATIC split up a lot of analogy but disperse in their aim classroom. 

The NEAR Protocol vs Polygon battle looks like to have ended in a mechanical tie, they can both coexist since they have unalike targets. Yes, they have analogy but that both are based on a prosperous type and are not obligatorily a bad thing. Both are coming, sustainable and have massy groundwork.

In the technologic part of the NEAR  vs MATIC counse, we initiate by observing that their algorism is  variant .  NEAR Protocol and Polygon  they both are by rate and decentralized. It’s worth notices that both aim at preservation hereafter fees and fast proceedings.

Related Search

Related exchanges


Is NEAR better than MATIC ?

To get an answer to the question of whether NEAR is better than MATIC requires a fundamental and technical analysis of the coins. NEAR Protocol and Polygon have both advantages and downsides, and if the market terms and conditions today are prejudiced in favor of buying NEAR Protocol, then the next day the situation may be altered right away due to the market volatility. The most important thing for a coin holder is to stay up-to-dated about the market changes.

Is MATIC better than NEAR ?

If today it is more money-making to buy Polygon than NEAR Protocol, it does not signify that it keeps going like that. The next day the market changes can be entirely different due to the high volatility nature of the coins. You have to regularly research the crypto asset environment and stay relevant not to be deprived of your investments. 

What is the difference between NEAR Protocol and Polygon ?

NEAR Protocol vs Polygon difference fundamentally reffers to the prices of the coins which can be determined with the help of Godex NEAR vs MATIC calculator or the NEAR Protocol vs Polygon vs usd chart in the run time mode.